Tuesday, October 25, 2005
Calling Intrigue Authors
I've been seeing questions about Intrigue's direction again. Isn't it interesting how often this question comes up?
When I sold my first book to Intrigue, my editor was very excited about the romance in my story. She indicated that many Intrigues were heavy on plot and that the romance often suffered. In my limited experience, that attitude has definitely changed.
As Patricia said a couple of months ago, the emphasis now seems to be on dark stories with plenty of action and constant danger. I love dark stories, the darker the better for me. And I've found that action begets action. Once I'm in the 'zone,' writing a suspense-filled action scene seems to lead to the next action scene and the next. It can be great fun to see how many ways the hero and heroine can tempt capture or death and still survive.
I recently received one of the most meaningful compliments I've ever received on a book. Someone said that although she knew the hero and heroine would survive and be together at the end of the book, she couldn't put the book down because she was scared to death that they might not survive. How great is that? Intrigue readers know they're going to get their happy ending, but they love to be held in suspense up until the last possible moment.
I'm enjoying writing edgier books, with badder villains and more hair-raising escapes, but I also love the romance. To me the most fun in writing Intrigues is the interweaving of the romance and the suspense. While the books are more plot-driven than they used to be, I don't want to sacrifice one bit of the romance. That wonderful 'aww...' ending when it's obvious the hero and heroine will live happily ever after is what I live for, in my reading and my writing.
Thursday, September 08, 2005
Big Sky Bounty Hunters mini-series
It's off to an exciting start with Amanda Stevens's GOING TO EXTREMES, and I'm anxious to read Jessica Andersen's BULLSEYE (1, I'm a fan of Jessica's medical thrillers, and 2, her hero, Jacob, plays a key supporting role in my book, so I want to see if I got the essence of his personality right).
The last three books in the series are
WARRIOR SPIRIT by Cassie Miles (October)
FORBIDDEN CAPTOR by Julie Miller (November)
RILEY'S RETRIBUTION by Rebecca York (December)
At www.eHarlequin.com, they're having a discussion on the series--guessing who mystery villains are, heroes they like/love, and so on.
What do you guys think?
Julie Miller
www.juliemiller.org
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Saturday, July 23, 2005
RWA Conference in Reno, NV--Julie Miller
I'm heading out there and dive into things almost as soon as I arrive. It should be fun!
Julie Miller
Wednesday, July 06, 2005
The changing world of Intrigue -- Patricia Rosemoor
My first Intrigues were very much romantic mysteries filled with clues, clues, clues. My first Intrigues were pretty spicy, but I soon let the heat take a back seat to the mystery. Then we were asked for more romance in our Intrigues and they heated up again. Traditional was the hallmark. Now it's not. The heroines are stronger. The danger is darker. For me, the darker the better. Especially if it's paranormal.
In GHOST HORSE, my July Eclipse/Intrigue, my heroine Chloe Morgan is drawn into a gothic story of a ghost horse who leads her to the truth of a friend who disappeared. I was able to cast doubt on hero Damian Graylord (it's a gothic -- a hero-in-doubt is traditional!). Is Damian really divorced or did he kill his wife? And who is making all those noises in the attic over Chloe's bed. Very fun to write.
As a reader, how have Intrigues changed for you? Do you feel the backlist still works or do you want something fresh? What would you like to see in an Intrigue?
Patricia Rosemoor
Saturday, July 02, 2005
Virgin Blog -- Adrianne Lee
Life has give me a few good slams in the past couple of years and I don't have an Intrigue coming out any time soon. But, I am working on a couple of romantic suspense ideas and have visions of a new contract in the near future.
Adrianne Lee
www.adriannelee.com
http://adrianneleeu.blogspot.com/ (coming soon)
Thursday, June 30, 2005
Julie Miller--Author workshops and public speaking
As a speaker/workshop presenter--what are the things you enjoy discussing the most/least? what's the scariest/most stressful part of presenting and what is the easiest for you?
As someone attending a workshop or author panel--what kind of things do you like to know from an author? Craft tips? Publishing secrets? Details on their stories? How s/he got started? Other?
Personally, I find it hard when I'm not given any guidelines beyond 'we want you to speak for 20-30 minutes--about whatever you want.' It's easier to structure a talk when you know the audience's expectations. But I love it when I get good, interesting questions from the audience--ones that are pertinent, but maybe not on issues that have been talked to death.
Julie Miller
www.juliemiller.org
Tuesday, June 28, 2005
MUSIC FOR INTRIGUES--Amanda Stevens
I'll admit my tastes are a little offbeat. For romance, I love New Wave music from the eighties (Images of Heaven, Send me an Angel...to name a couple of my favorite songs). For dark, dark, dark stories, there is nothing like Skinny Puppy to evoke a nightmarish mood. For anyone not familiar with this band, their music was just used on the new TV show "The Inside". Also Massive Attack (Flight of the Phoenix, Mission: Impossible, Stigmata, Moulin Rouge) can really get the adrenaline going.
Does anyone else use music for inspiration? What songs/artists are a natural fit for your Intrigues?
Amanda Stevens
www.amandastevens.com
Saturday, June 25, 2005
Paranormal in Eclipse--Rebecca York
I'm doing it. But I've been writing for Intrigue since 1991.
Can someone who's come on board in the past few years answer the question?
My guess is that they would have discouraged it a few years ago. But it would be more likely now that paranormal is so popular.
Ruth/Rebecca York
ECLIPSE--Amanda Stevens
I love gothics, with or without paranormal elements, so I'm thrilled to hear they're so hot right now.
Amanda Stevens
www.amandastevens.com
Friday, June 24, 2005
Envelope Pushing--Julie Miller
While I haven't heard anything corporately about Intrigue guidelines changing, I do get a sense from talking to other authors and in my own writing that there are some subtle changes--all directly related to marketing. One, they're definitely looking for young voices since they really want to pull in and keep younger readers--I think that's another reason we can push some of the content as well--younger readers have been exposed to a lot more technology; the news is in their faces from a lot of sources; younger readers tend to take more chances/be more flexible; and they tend to like more action/steam/danger/unpredictability than veteran readers who are used to seeing a line a certain way.
I know the more books I write, the more the editors trust my judgment--for example, in my first books, the H/h got together pretty quickly. In one of my recent books, they didn't meet until Ch. 3. My characters can curse more now than before, if the situation calls for it. Some of my stories are getting more mainstream, but they still have that satisfying ending (still a must for me).
I don't know how much I push the envelope, content-wise (though I've dealt with some pretty traumatic issues, created some unusual characters, made up plausible technology, litter the place with dead bodies
As far as specific trends, they come and go. But right now I think paranormal and Gothic are hot (hence, the success of the Eclipse sub-series).
Just some thoughts.
Julie Miller
www.juliemiller.org
HOW FAR IS TOO FAR--Amanda Stevens
I was really surprised that I was allowed to do this story. The creepy aspects aside, it was understood from the beginning that the heroine wasn't 'cured'. Her body could reject the new heart at any time, she was prone to infections, had to take tons of medications daily, and there was a good chance she would need another transplant down the road. It was definitely not a happily ever after scenario. After I'd written the book, I kind of wondered if I'd bitten off more than I could chew in an Intrigue.
Which brings me to my questions. Do you think the majority of Intrigue readers like it when we 'push the envelope', or do they prefer a more traditional mystery? How far is too far?
Amanda Stevens
Tuesday, June 21, 2005
PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
In my 2nd Intrigue the hero calls a really nasty guy a 'son of a bitch' and my editor said 'we don't usually allow that but in this case I think it's appropriate.'
In SEEKING ASYLUM, coming out in August, my hero has to go undercover in a mental hospital and receive treatments and shock therapy. Plus he's psychic. He's pretty darn messed up. I really thought that one would be nixed.
And... in the anthology coming out in November I got to use 'crap'!!!!(Geez, I sound like the writers of NYPD Blue, don't I?) And, I have an ambiguously gay sex scene from the villain's POV which is just this side of very explicit. I was really surprised it got to stay in. Probably because I never actually mention the sex of his partner, but it's pretty obvious from the descriptions. :)
Click on mallorykane.com to visit my web page.
Monday, June 20, 2005
Just a drop-in
Hello and sorry for my absence . . . I was off sailing around the lovely islands serving absolutely no purpose. Not so different from my regular life (where I also have little purpose), just different scenery. I did treat myself to the Internet cafe on board the ship. Now, I can spend money with the best of them, but sticking my credit card in the machine to pay a small fortune for some web time is not my idea of fun spending. But one morning I decided it was worth it, so I took my coffee and went down to watch the sunrise and send an email to my daughter.
There's a husband and wife there, obviously upset. He's got red eyes, she's sniffing, but I try to mind my own business and write my email. I'm a really lousy typist. Never learned. But, I have pointlessly long fingernails, so I suppose I do make a bit of noise. A few expensive minutes go by and the man comes over to me and says . . .
"Excuse me, but we don't know how to work the Internet, can you help?"
I look into his sad, teary eyes, and say, "Sure, what do you need?"
"Well," he sniffs, "we've had a death in the family, so we need to find a flight from St. Bart's back to Wisconsin. How do we do that?"
So, with my credit card securely slipped into the slot, I start searching all the travel sites while his wife man's the communal printer. I go to the airline sites, everything I can think of, all the while, he's weepy and she's sniffing. Finally, after $65.00 in charges, the cheapest thing I can find is around $800.00. The information spits from the printer.
The wife says, "Honey, we can't afford that much for plane tickets."
So I say, "Ma'am, once you get home, you can send a copy of the obituary and/or the death certificate to the airline and I'm sure they'll give you some sort of bereavement fare."
He says, "Really?"
"Yes," I tell him. "They are really quite accommodating."
His eyes brighten. "Even when it's your cat that died?"
So, I'm pretty much out $65.00 and last I heard, they were putting Fluffy in the neighbor's deep freeze until the ship returned to the US.
Welcome to summer!
Kelsey
FILM AT ELEVEN, July, 2005
pushing the envelope--Rebecca York
At the moment, I am writing a vampire book, THE SECRET NIGHT. I am finished the book and editing it. And I'm worried about the first scene. The vampire hero is a private detective and he has been hired to stop a bunch of low life bikers from partying in a graveyard. As I've written it, he scares the spit out of them, and they leave. But he doesn't bite anyone on the neck or anything really heavy. What do you all think? How far can I go? As I wrote it, the reader doesn't even know he's a vampire until chapter two. Am I safer leaving it that way? Or should I write it the way I'd write it if it were one of my single-title Berkley books?
Darn--I forgot to change the font color. And the size. Sorry. Anybody know how to block one of these messages? Every time i try that, the whole message goes away.
Ruth/Rebecca
Sunday, June 19, 2005
Pushing the envelope -- Patricia Rosemoor
I'll go first. In my December Silhouette Bombshell, my heroine is trapped in a room privy to a sex scene/blood drinking (yes, vampire) scenario in the next room. It turns out the vamp wasn't drinking from a man but another woman. I was seriously nervous that I might be asked to change that, but not a word . . .
Patricia
Julie Miller--Just Dropping By/Satisfying Endings
Haven't been by for a while so I thought I'd check in. You know, sometimes I don't think my life could get any busier, then, voila!, there's always something more to do. So I apologize for not getting here sooner. There's always something interesting to discuss, and I'm afraid I'll get distracted (I think my self-discipline has gone on summer vacation :) Even though work and family and life haven't taken a break!)
I do think one of the newer trends in romance novels, especially in a more mainstream line like Intrigue, is the idea that a 'satisfying' ending is just as acceptable as a 'happily-ever-after' ending. Sometimes, because of the plot and character demands, timeline of the story, etc., it just isn't realistic for every story to have the H/h get married/pregnant/propose/etc., that have been the staple of romance novels for years. I DO think it's important that they H/h make a commitment by the end of an Intrigue, since it is a series romance line. The reader (and I, the writer) wants that sense of closure--that security or reassurance--that everything will turn out okay for this couple that we've invested however many hours of our lives in. That commitment/security is a happy ending for me--what's being referred to now as a satisfying ending. Personally, I don't like it when the complete, traditional ending is tacked on to a book, when it seems forced or out of character for that completion to occur.
My best example is in my Intrigue, UNSANCTIONED MEMORIES. The heroine is a rape survivor, and much of the story deals with her recovery from the trauma, and learning to trust a man (and herself) in a relationship again. The hero is a man bent on vengeance, who initially deceives the heroine (not good for trust issues) in order to accomplish that goal. Of course, part of his character journey is to learn that vengeance won't bring back the loved-one he lost, it hurts to deceive someone he cares about, taking care of the living is more important than taking care of a memory, that positive emotions are more healing than negative ones, etc. For me, both characters had too far to go emotionally for them to be at the HEA point at the end of 300 pages. Instead, the story ends with them going to bed together for the first time, and him making the promise that they'll go through counseling together. They acknowledge that sex and a relationship won't be smooth sailing for them, but--the commitment to stick with a relationship through this healing/growth process gave me a sense of satisfaction. U MEMORIES is part of my Taylor Clan mini-series, and they do eventually get married in the last book of the series. But those characters needed that time.
So, yeah, imo, that satisfaction/security must be there at the end of a romance or romantic suspense novel. Sometimes, they do get to a wedding or delivery of a baby or a marriage proposal, sometimes, they don't. For me, without that commitment at the end of the story, it's not a romance novel to me. It might still be a good book, but if I'm writing or reading romance/romantic suspense, then that's a guarantee I want--a satisfying ending, or a believably traditional ending if it fits.
My long-winded thoughts.
Okay, now I really must get back to work!!
Julie Miller
www.juliemiller.org
Thursday, June 16, 2005
HEA Problem--Rebecca York
Heroine Problems
Mallory Kane
